Ambrose Bierce’s Write It Right: The Celebrated Cynic’s Language Peeves Deciphered, Appraised, and Annotated for 21st-Century Readers

Description

pp. 229, “Bierce’s list includes some distinctions still familiar today–the which-that rule, less vs. fewer, lie and lay — but it also abounds in now-forgotten shibboleths: Ovation, the critics of his time agreed, meant a Roman triumph, not a round of applause. Reliable was an ill-formed coinage, not for the discriminating. Donate was pretentious, jeopardize should be jeopard, demean meant “comport oneself,” not “belittle.” And Bierce made up a few peeves of his own for good measure. We should say “a coating of paint,” he instructed, not “a coat.” To mark the 100th anniversary of Write It Right, language columnist Jan Freeman has investigated where Bierce’s rules and taboos originated, how they’ve fared in the century since the blacklist, and what lies ahead. Will our language quibbles seem as odd in 2109 as Bierce’s do today? From the evidence offered here, it looks like a very good bet.”